Blog

Adaptation: Disability Doesn’t Have to Be a Tragedy

An analysis of disability in the movies and some pointed comments. Title graphic showing a wheelchair user sitting on the beach holding a bunch of balloons. The arms are outstretched and celebration. "Adaptation: disability doesn't have to be a tragedy." Logo for The Seated View

Updated March 10, 2021

What happens when someone gets a disability? Practical matters aside — and there are a lot of those — it is an emotional roller coaster of shock, depression, grieving, and it can take a long time to adapt and adjust. Most people do. Of course not all, but most. This, however, is rarely the case in the movies.

When The Sea Inside came out for rental, I’d very much looked forward to seeing it as the phenomenal Javier Bardem is one of my favourite actors. It was in theatres at the same time as Million Dollar Baby, and both about the same theme: what happens when someone who’s led a very physical life becomes disabled.

My impression of Baby was less-than-stellar. Don’t get it wrong, the performances were very good, the direction was excellent, but the story is exploitative, manipulative, tearjerking crap. NB: SPOILER AHEAD!

No, I don’t feel strongly about it at all. Why d’you ask?

I think this kind of story is only “inspiring” to able-bodied people. I am in general very supportive of the right to do what you want with your life, including ending it if you think it necessary. That said, when you have a disability and have created a joyful life with and around that condition, watching someone choose to die merely because they can’t walk anymore… Well, it hits a nerve.

This, by the way, is not an unusual conclusion for able-bodied people who haven’t spent a lot of time around disability. I have forgotten how many times someone able-bodied have told me that “if I lost the use of my legs, I’d kill myself.” I often take a moment for some education — i.e., a gentle smack upside the head — but what’s left unsaid is usually my opinion about this thought process. Which is that such people demonstrate a profound lack of imagination. Because if you can only imagine a life is worthwhile if you can independently walk around in it, then you have a lot to learn.

But back to the movies. While waiting for Sea to come out on DVD, I’d been playing with writing something about how sick I am of creative media using disability as some sort of twisted cripple version of the madonna/whore metaphor. The person with the disability tends to be portrayed as saintly and inspiring or conversely, the disability is an outward symptom of evil.

I’m also sick of how taking a role as someone with an illness or disability (and They – the They in charge of greenlighting such dreck – seldom differentiate between the two) is the surest way to get an Oscar nomination. Or how offended I am that these sort of stories rarely focus on the person’s life and talent. Instead, the storyline is usually about the Tragedy of being unable to walk and how Profound and Uplifting and Brave these characters were for choosing to die, rather than spending the rest of their lives in this non-life, this hell.

Barf-o-rama.

Disability = tragic is the only perspective shown by Hollywood. A rant about euthanasia and #disability in the movies.

When I’d only seen Baby, that was what I’d planned to say. Then I watched Sea and…. it’s different. It’s not perfect, but it is based on Ramon Sampedro’s real story. It had “been there” credibility, instead of being some able-bodied writer’s idea of using the disability as a plot point guiding someone else’s journey towards redemption.

Whereas Baby left me enraged at its presumptions about disability as a Fate Worse Than Death, Sea made me argue both points furiously. With myself. Alternating rapidly. One moment, I defended Sampedro’s right to do what he wished with his life, the next I was yelling about maybe if instead of lying in bed on the third floor of an ancient farmhouse for almost 30 years, the man had gotten some accessible housing, attendant care, and a good therapist, he might have been able to find meaning in life again.

And maybe I’m as judgemental as those people who think they’d have to kill themselves if they lost the use of their legs. Partly for thinking that Ramon Sampedro’s desire to die was somehow more valid than Maggie Fitzgerald’s (from Million Dollar Baby). Why? Because he’d wanted it for a longer time. It takes time to adapt to losing the way things were and after 30 years, I think he’d given it enough thought.

Which brings me to the other part – the one where I don’t understand the willingness to give up, to not try. Sure, I’ve got my own theoretical scenarios where I can imagine saying “I’m done with this struggle,” but I’ve used my wheelchair long enough to know that eventually, you tend to adapt and life gets good again. For me, it’s about fighting tooth and nail to create a meaningful, joyful life. It’s about dusting yourself off and getting back on the horse that threw you. About not letting the bastards get you down.

Or in the invigorating words of Louisa May Alcott: “Resolved: To take Fate by the throat and shake a living out of her.”

9 Comments

  1. Anonymous on May 26, 2005 at 5:21 pm

    Best book on the subject nomination would go to A Whole New Life by Reynolds Price. Since he’s also a poet and novelist, he can achieve levels of vituperation for impersonal doctors, badly designed facilities and other camel’s-back-straws that most of us, “temporarily abled” or not, can only dream of (and since he’s a pithy, the book is slim.) But he also addresses attitude and adaptation so insightfully that really the only person who wouldn’t find A Whole New Life useful would be someone to whom nothing bad is ever going to happen. (rams)



  2. Michele on May 26, 2005 at 5:53 pm

    wow!!!



  3. kendall on May 26, 2005 at 8:01 pm

    I don’t remember how I found your blog, but I’m glad I did. Judging from your writing, and your favorite things in your profile, I think we would get along well. I really like your reaction in this post. I’m so tired of the attitude that a person is the sum of their physical parts. We revere the people in our history like Helen Keller who overcame great obstacles to live an amazing life, and yet we also look down on the very obstacles that she overcame. Thanks for putting that in better words than I ever could, and doing it from a greater vantage point than I have.



  4. Michelle T in Oregon on May 27, 2005 at 1:35 am

    Thank you for your musings. My son has autism. I am tired of the whole thing around Hollywood making people with mental disabilities look like mascots or “cute;” insignificant.(Re: The Other Sister, and MANY others) Yes, my son IS cute, charming, and I couldn’t imagine my life without him. But he’s a PERSON. Complex, complicated; with wants, needs, and dreams.



  5. Janine on May 27, 2005 at 2:44 pm

    Bravo! I couldn’t have said it better. Have been reading your blogg for a while now and if only the powers that be spoke as much sense perhaps the world would be a better place.



  6. Carol on May 27, 2005 at 7:07 pm

    Lene, I saw The Sea Inside this spring. I also found myself arguing vehemently both sides of the argument. Vehemently. Understand, please, that my mother had polio in 1954 and dealt with the after-effects all the days of her remaining life. Like you, she maintained the mindset that “life is for living” and by golly, she did. Every minute of every day, right up until the day she died from acute leukemia, osteomyelitis and pneumonia. The pain was incredible. But she never gave up. Keep fighting the good fight — one day I believe those of us who feel that disabilities are not for exploitation will win.



  7. Trevor on May 27, 2005 at 9:10 pm

    Hey there!Enjoyed the spoilers. 🙂I haven’t bothered to watch either movie, but knowing the storyline of <>The Sea Inside<>, I thought to myself – he spends 30 years fighting to die? Huh? Surely at some point he should have realized that he was managing life.Having <>schizophrenia<>, I agree that too often mental illness is either a defect, or a mark of evil, or both. Apart from the usual portrayal of schizophrenia being some sort of split personality disorder (it’s nothing like that), it usually involves someone on a killing spree. And don’t get me started on the way that psychotic and psychopathic are used interchangibly in movies and tv shows.Some people wondered why I enjoyed <>Me, Myself, and Irene<>, starring Jim Carrey (as I move the topic back to movies). I liked it, partly cuz I like stupid/silly movies, and despite referring to his split personality disorder as schizophrenia, it was great seeing that the character was not a serial killer or rapist. I mean, seriously, how many mainstream movies have the main character being mentally ill and not being a killer or being pitied by everyone around them.There’s my rant.



  8. Mor on May 28, 2005 at 2:56 am

    Very well put my darling daughter.As always I do agree with you on this subject. I loath the versions Hollywood spit out about disability. They have no clue do they?



  9. dawn on May 31, 2005 at 3:19 pm

    Like Trevor I haven’t seen the movies so can’t say much on them. I do know that I am so terribly tired of seeing people portrayed as the stereotypes. It worries me that they are still making money doing this same old shtick. Does that mean that most people are happy having their same old perspectives reflected back in their faces? Or is it just that the media machine is slow to catch on? Or is it that I am just getting older and crankier and what used to pass as entertaining now seems like drivel.